Compare / Harvest
Landing Platform vs Harvest: timesheets that fill themselves
Harvest makes logging time quick. Landing makes it mostly unnecessary: every night, each person's Outlook meetings become time against the right client, capped at the hours they owe. Then the hours feed projects, invoices, capacity and profit per client on the same record.
Landing suits you if
- You're tired of chasing timesheets every Monday
- You want the hours to land on the project, the invoice and the margin without exporting
- You want approvals and profit reports without a higher tier
Where the hours go missing.
Harvest records the time people remember to enter. The rest is the problem.
Friday-afternoon guesswork
A timer only works if someone starts it. Meetings, calls and quick jobs go unlogged, then get reconstructed from memory at the end of the week.
Reports a tier up
Profitability reporting and timesheet approvals sit on Harvest's Enterprise plan, not the Teams plan most teams start on.
Time in one tool, work in another
The projects, the deals and the client record live somewhere else, so every question about margin starts with an export.
Landing Platform vs Harvest, line by line.
On logging, approving and billing time Landing does what Harvest does, and fills most of the week before anyone opens it. Then it runs the projects, deals and people the hours belong to.
| Feature | Landing Platform |  Harvest |
|---|---|---|
| Logging time | Timers, a week grid, and timesheets filled overnight from each person's Outlook calendarCore | Timers, timesheets and calendar imports |
| Filling the gaps | Overlapping meetings merged, the client worked out from who was invited, the day capped at what each person owes; anything they typed is left aloneCore | Entered by the person |
| Reminders | By email or text to anyone still short, sent on their own | Included |
| Approvals and locking | Reviewed or not, locked daily, weekly, fortnightly or monthly, per person, team or companyCore | Approvals on Enterprise |
| Invoicing | From logged hours, milestones or a monthly retainer, with checkout to get paidCore | From tracked time and expenses |
| Profit per client | By client, project and person, costed at each person's real rateGrowth | Profitability reports on Enterprise |
| Projects and capacity | Boards, Gantt with dependencies, and capacity twelve weeks aheadCore | Forecast is a separate product |
| CRM, email and helpdesk | Contacts, deals, email campaigns, pages and a helpdesk on the same recordCore | Not included |
| HR records | Records, contracts, time off and the org chartCore | Not included |
Plan tags show where a feature starts on Landing: Core, Growth or Scale. Harvest details reflect its publicly available plans as of 2026; check current details on its own site.
What it costs, side by side.
Harvest charges per seat, with profitability and approvals on its higher plan. Landing charges full price only for the people who run the work; everyone who only logs time is a Member.
Harvest, as it lists it
How Harvest is sold, as its pricing page lists it (September 2026).
And still to buy separately: a project tool, a CRM, an email tool and an HR app.
a month on Landing, billed yearly, ex VAT
Includes timesheets filled from Outlook, approvals, leave, invoicing, projects, capacity, CRM, email, pages, helpdesk and HR. Profit per client is on Growth.
Work out your own priceExample team: three people who run projects and billing every day, seventeen who log time and approve. Credits for AI, SMS and lookups come from a shared pool each Builder adds to.
Switching is our job, not yours.
We move you over one tool a month, against success criteria we agree with you up front. You don't pay until we prove each one is ready.
We map your stack
Show us your Harvest setup and the tools around it. We agree what moves where, and what "ready" means for each tool, before you commit to anything.
We move Harvest across
We bring your clients, projects, rates and time history across as part of the switch, then connect each person's Outlook so tomorrow's timesheets start filling themselves. We check totals match before you switch off.
You sign it off
Billing starts only when we have shown it works against the criteria you set. Then we move the next tool, one a month.
But everyone already knows Harvest.
Fair. Here are the questions teams ask us most when they weigh it up.
How does the Outlook fill actually work?
Each night, opted-in people have their Outlook meetings turned into time. Overlapping meetings are merged, the client is worked out from the attendees and rules it remembers, meetings with nobody else invited are judged by AI, and the day is capped at what the person owes. Anything they typed or edited is never touched.
Can people still use a timer?
Yes. Timers, a week grid and the overnight fill all write to the same timesheet, and reminders go by email or text to anyone still short.
Do approvals cost extra?
No. Review and locking are part of Core, set per person, team or company, and reports never wait for approval to be accurate.
Who needs a paid seat?
Everyone who logs time, but at the Member rate, from £4 a month. Full Builder seats are only for the people who run projects, billing and sales every day.
How many hours go unbilled?
The free unbilled hours calculator puts a figure on the time that never reaches an invoice.
“We were running PR, social scheduling and the rest of our marketing across half a dozen tools that never talked. Now we plan, schedule and measure from a single screen.”
Stop chasing timesheets on Monday.
Thirty minutes on how your team logs time today. We'll show you last week filled from Outlook, and what it costs.